Read the full judgment text of CAAR 000015/1973 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. The respondent in this case was found guilty of being in possession of forged dies contrary to section 76(2) of the Crimes Ordinance. The particulars of the offence were that he had in his possession four chops, purporting to be chops of the Passport Office, Penang, Malaysia, i.e. one forged chop for the words "PASSPORT OFFICE MALAYSIA PENANG"; a second forged chop for the words "PASSPORT OFFICER PENANG"; the third forged chop bore the signature of a Passport Officer authorised to sign Malays