Read the full judgment text of DCEC 228/2014 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 24 June 2015.
1. The applicant (“ Man ”) claims compensation for alleged injury at work against the 1 st respondent (“ Maintop ”) as the employer and the 2 nd respondent (“ Chi Shing ”) as the alleged principal contractor from which Maintop contracted the work. Chi Shing now applies to strike out the claim against it on the ground that Chi Shing was never involved, and the work was subcontracted by its related company to Maintop. Man resists the striking out.