Read the full judgment text of CACV 000187/1985 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. These three cases have come before us, and have been argued together, in the absence of all three Defendants. It is an appeal against decisions of Masters who have refused to allow oral examination of judgment debtors under 0.49B r.1 of the Rules of the Supreme Court. The reasons given were that the proceedings were within the jurisdiction of the District Court and ought therefore not to have been brought in the High Court so that 0. 49B was not appropriate; secondly that the Plaintiffs shoul
Cited by 1 case