Read the full judgment text of HCA 1716/2012 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 29 July 2015.
1. This is not a contest between wife and husband but between daughter-in-law (plaintiff) and father-in-law (defendant) respectively. The subject property is held in the sole name of the defendant. The purchase price came partly from the plaintiff and partly from the defendant. Part of the source of both parties’ money was the plaintiff’s husband (ie the defendant’s son). The issues are the purposes of that money; and whether the plaintiff is a beneficial owner of the property under the princ
Cited by 3 cases · Cites 2 cases