HKSAR v. Chris Cotton
Read the full judgment text of HCMA 152/2015 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 7 August 2015.
1. On 12 February 2015, the appellant was convicted after trial for the offences of criminal damage and common assault for which he was fined $4,000 and $1,000 respectively.
Cited by 4 cases
|
HCMA 152/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO 152 OF 2015 (ON APPEAL FROM ESCC 4026 OF 2014 ) ______________________
______________________
______________ J U D G M E N T ______________ 1.On 12 February 2015, the appellant was convicted after trial for the offences of criminal damage and common assault for which he was fined $4,000 and $1,000 respectively. 2.He filed a Notice of appeal and generally complained that the Magistrate erred in his findings in failing to take account of the fact that the appellant was seeking to arrest a suspected offender. 3.The Magistrate accepted that the appellant was chasing after a thief to recover his backpack, but concluded his actions by the force that he had used went beyond what was reasonable. 4.I have considered the Magistrate’s statement of findings and find no reason to interfere with the outcome of his decision. 5.The appellant has failed to attend today’s hearing and the previous hearing on 22 April 2015. I am informed that the appellant left Hong Kong on 15 February 2015 and has not returned. The police have made every effort to contact him, but to no avail. 6.It appears therefore that he is no longer in the jurisdiction and has not sought to pursue his appeal. So, accordingly, I dismiss the appeal.
Mr Prakash L Daryanani, SPP of the Department of Justice, for HKSAR Appellant was not represented and did not appear |
Other judgments that cite this case