BabelCite

HKSAR v. Leung Pui and Others

Read the full judgment text of CACC 349/2014 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 12 August 2015.

1. Paragraph 36, line 14 “if not the intervention of the police” should read as “if not for the intervention of the police” ;

Cites 1 case

Case No.CACC 349/2014
Court
Court of Appeal
Date12 Aug 2015
Judge—
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACC 349/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 349 OF 2014

(ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO. 295 OF 2014)

____________

BETWEEN
HKSAR
 Respondent
and
LEUNG PUI (梁培) 1st Applicant
WONG WAI KEUNG (黃偉強) 2nd Applicant
CHEUNG HIU WAI (張曉偉) 3rd Applicant
HO BIN (高彬) 4th Applicant
LO SIU WAH (盧少華) 5th Applicant
CHAU CHEUNG LUN (鄒暢麟) 6th Applicant
SHING CHEUNG (成祥) 7th Applicant

____________

Before : Hon Lunn VP and Barnes J in Court
Date of Hearing : 22 May 2015
Date of Judgment : 12 August 2015

________________________

CORRIGENDA

________________________

The following amendments are made to the Judgment dated 12 August 2015:

1. Paragraph 36, line 14 “if not the intervention of the police” should read as “if not for the intervention of the police” ;

2. Paragraph 44, line 2 “there is an addition another factor” should read as “there is in addition another factor”;

3. Paragraph 51, line 2 “a planner of the robber” should read as “a planner of the robbery”;

4. Paragraph 53, line 4 “the fact that the fact that a person comes to Hong Kong” should read as “the fact that a person comes to Hong Kong”;

Dated the 18th day of August 2015.

(Kate Fan)
Clerk to Hon Lunn VP

Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

HKSAR v. Leung Pui and Others
CACC 349/2014
Court of Appeal
Full analysis
12 Aug 2015
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACC 349/2014

HKSAR v. Leung Pui and Others
Court of Appeal
Full analysis
12 Aug 2015