Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 4 July 1972.
1. I agree. The Respondent established a strong probability that she would succeed in the action. That was not enough to entitle her to interim injunctions and the first issue which had to be decided by the judge in chambers was what was the status quo. On any reasonable view of the facts the Respondent had a right of access to the house and the Appellants excluded her. She required access for legitimate purposes, but the Appellants sought to impose conditions upon her entry. That could not