Hong Kong Telecommunications (Hkt) Ltd v. The Communications Authority

Read the full judgment text of CACV 144/2014 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 7 August 2015.

1.  7 th line of paragraph 2, “Telecommunications Authority” should read “Communications Authority”.

Cites 4 cases

Case No.CACV 144/2014
Court
Court of Appeal
Date07 Aug 2015
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 144/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO 144 OF 2014

(ON APPEAL FROM NO 31 IN THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS
(COMPETITION PROVISIONS) APPEAL BOARD)

_______________

  IN THE MATTER OF the Telecommunications Ordinance (Cap 106)
  and
  IN THE MATTER OF Appeal No 31 to the Telecommunications (Competition Provisions) Appeal Board Pursuant to Section 32N of the Telecommunications Ordinance (Cap 106)

_______________

BETWEEN    
  HONG KONG TELECOMMUNICATIONS (HKT) LTD Applicant
  and  
  THE COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY Respondent
  and  
  APPLE ASIA LIMITED Intervener

_______________

CACV 147/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO 147 OF 2014

(ON APPEAL FROM NO 31 IN THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS
(COMPETITION PROVISIONS) APPEAL BOARD)

_______________

  IN THE MATTER OF the Telecommunications Ordinance (Cap 106)
  and
  IN THE MATTER OF Appeal No 31 to the Telecommunications (Competition Provisions) Appeal Board Pursuant to Section 32N of the Telecommunications Ordinance (Cap 106)

_______________

BETWEEN    
  HONG KONG TELECOMMUNICATIONS (HKT) LTD Applicant
  and  
  THE COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY Respondent
  and  
  APPLE ASIA LIMITED Intervener

_______________

Before : Hon Lam VP, Hon Barma JA and Hon Poon J in Court
Date of Hearing : 28 July 2015
Date of Judgment : 7 August 2015
Date of Corrigendum: 21 August 2015

-----------------------

Corrigendum

-----------------------

Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 7 August 2015:-

1.  7th line of paragraph 2, “Telecommunications Authority” should read “Communications Authority”.

2.  Footnote 4 in page 4, “CACV 117/2014” should read “CACV 147/2014”.

3.  4th line of paragraph 42, “Authority to impose…” should read “Appeal Board to impose…”.

4.  1st line of paragraph 44, “Authority is entitled…” should read “Appeal Board is entitled…”.

5.  8th line of paragraph 48, “CACV 190/2014” should read “CACV 190/2013”.

Dated this 21 day of August 2015

  (Luis CHUNG)
  Clerk to the Hon. Mr. Justice Poon