Read the full judgment text of CACC 390/2014 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 4 September 2015.
1. The appellant was tried in the District Court before Deputy District Judge Mitchell (“the judge”). He was charged with blackmail, contrary to section 23(1) and (3) of the Theft Ordinance, Cap 210. The Particulars of Offence alleged that on a day unknown in mid-November 2013, near Hung Yuen Road, Hung Shui Kiu, Tin Shui Wai, the appellant made an unwarranted demand of $30,000 from X with menaces. He was convicted of this charge on 5 November 2014 and on the same day he was sentenced to a pe
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case