Read the full judgment text of CACC 390/2014 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 9 July 2015.
1. The applicant appeared in the District Court charged with blackmail, contrary to section 23(1) and (3) of the Theft Ordinance, Cap 210. The Particulars of Offence alleged that on a day unknown in mid-November 2013, near Hung Yuen Road, Hung Shui Kiu, Tin Shui Wai, the applicant made an unwarranted demand of $30,000 from X with menaces. He was tried before Deputy District Judge Mitchell (“the judge”) and on 5 November 2014 he was convicted of this charge. On the same day he was sentenced to
Cites 1 case