Maryo Development Ltd v. Tsang Yau May and Others

Read the full judgment text of CACV 101/2015 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 24 September 2015.

Cites 1 case

Case No.CACV 101/2015
Court
Court of Appeal
Date24 Sep 2015
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 101/2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO 101 OF 2015

(ON APPEAL FROM HCA NO 2297 OF 2012)

--------------------------

BETWEEN
  MARYO DEVELOPMENT LIMITED Plaintiff
  (登彩發展有限公司)  
and
  TSANG YAU MAY (曾幼) 1st Defendant
  TSANG KWONG KAN (曾廣勤) 2nd Defendant
  WONG YAT MAN SUNNY (王逸敏) 3rd Defendant

--------------------------

AND
(ON APPEAL FROM HCA NO 271 OF 2013)

--------------------------

BETWEEN
  MARYO DEVELOPMENT LIMITED Plaintiff
  (登彩發展有限公司)  
and
  TSANG YAU MAY (曾幼) Defendant

--------------------------

(Consolidated by the Order of Master J Wong dated 30 August 2013)

Before: Hon Barma JA and McWalters JA in Court
Date of Hearing: 24 September 2015
Date of Decision: 24 September 2015
Date of Reasons for Decision: 2 October 2015

-------------------------------------

CORRIGENDUM

-------------------------------------

The paragraph 5 on page 3 Line F,

“The 3rd defendant and the police both engaged different experts to value the jadeite.”

should read

“The 3rd defendant and the plaintiff both engaged different experts to value the jadeite.”

The paragraph 5 on page 3 Line H,

“The police expert assessed the retail value of the jadeite as at June 2011 as being $276,440 to $405,045 and wholesale value as being $193,508 to $324,036.”

should read

“The plaintiff’s expert assessed the retail value of the jadeite as at June 2011 as being $276,440 to $405,045 and wholesale value as being $193,508 to $324,036.”

Dated this 16th day of October, 2015.

  (Danny Tse)
  Clerk to Hon McWalters JA