HKSAR v. Ata, Asaf
Read the full judgment text of FAMC 38/2015 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment.
1. We grant the applicant leave to appeal confined to the ground referred to in the applicant’s skeleton argument as “Ground 1 (the Lee Fuk Hing [1] Point)”, on the basis that it is reasonably arguable that, on the aforesaid ground, there has been a substantial and grave injustice.
Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case
|
FAMC No. 38 of 2015 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 38 OF 2015 (CRIMINAL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM _____________________ BETWEEN:
_____________________
___________________________ DETERMINATION ___________________________ Mr Justice Ribeiro Ag CJ: 1.We grant the applicant leave to appeal confined to the ground referred to in the applicant’s skeleton argument as “Ground 1 (the Lee Fuk Hing[1] Point)”, on the basis that it is reasonably arguable that, on the aforesaid ground, there has been a substantial and grave injustice. 2.The appeal will be heard on 14 April 2016.
Mr Gerard McCoy SC and Ms Emma TC Tsang, instructed by Littlewoods, assigned by the Director of Legal Aid, for the applicant Mr Raymond Cheng, SPP, of the Department of Justice, for the respondent |
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case