Anthony a Sperandeo v. George Lencsak and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCMP 1022/2013 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 4 December 2015.
1. On page 14, line 2, the words in brackets should be amended to read "(and they were adduced by the 1st Respondent)".
Cites 1 case
Case No.HCMP 1022/2013
Court
High Court CFI
Date04 Dec 2015
Judge—
Case Document
100%Judiciary
|
HCMP 1022/2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 1022 OF 2013 ____________
|
____________
| BETWEEN | ||
| ANTHONY A SPERANDEO | Petitioner | |
| and | ||
| GEORGE LENCSAK | 1st Respondent | |
| BARRINGTON STUDIOS LIMITED | 2nd Respondent |
____________
| Before: Hon Harris J in Court |
| Dates of Hearing: 4, 7 and 9 September 2015 |
| Date of Judgment: 4 December 2015 |
_________________________
CORRIGENDUM
_________________________
1. On page 14, line 2, the words in brackets should be amended to read "(and they were adduced by the 1st Respondent)".
| (Janice Li) | |
| Clerk to the Honourable Mr. Justice Harris | |
| 14th December 2015 |
Cites 1 case
Cases cited in this judgment
Other Judgments in This Case
Further hearings and rulings under HCMP 1022/2013