Read the full judgment text of HCMP 774/2015 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 8 March 2016.
1. The principal question which I have to decide is what is the consequence of a lapse of the leave granted by the court to an applicant to apply for an order of committal as a result of his failure to enter the originating summons for hearing within 14 days after such leave was granted under Order 52, rule 3(2) of the Rules of the High Court (Cap 4A) – in particular does the lapse of leave mean that the court has no jurisdiction to entertain a fresh application by the applicant for leave to app
Cites 5 cases