Read the full judgment text of FCMC 15393/2014 on BabelCite. This Family Court judgment was delivered on 14 March 2016 before DDJ K K PANG.
Matrimonial causes – Costs – Prohibition order – District Court Ordinance s.52E – Variation of costs order nisi – Ex-parte application – Unmeritorious application – Discontinuance – Jurisdiction to vary perfected costs order nisi – Validity of application by letter – Sufficiency of evidence for prohibition order – Costs allocation – Costs order nisi varied to effect no order as to costs of ex-parte application – W pays 50% of H's costs of variation application
Legal issues: Jurisdiction to vary costs order nisi · Validity of application by letter · Merits of prohibition order under s.52E DCO · Costs of ex-parte application · Costs of variation application
Outcome: Costs order nisi varied; No order as to costs of ex-parte application; W pays 50% of H's costs of variation application.
Cites 1 case