HKSAR v. Liang Yaoqiang

Read the full judgment text of FAMC 60/2015 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment.

1. The Appeal Committee grants leave to appeal in respect of the following question of law, namely:

Cited by 2 cases

Case No.FAMC 60/2015
Court
FAMC
Date
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

FAMC No. 60 of 2015

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 60 OF 2015 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

FROM CACC NO. 131 OF 2014)

____________________

BETWEEN

  HKSAR Respondent
  and
  LIANG Yaoqiang (梁耀強)
Applicant

____________________

Appeal Committee:Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ, Mr Justice Tang PJ and Mr Justice Fok PJ
Date of Hearing and Determination: 26 May 2016

_________________________

D E T E R M I N A T I O N

_________________________

Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ:

1.The Appeal Committee grants leave to appeal in respect of the following question of law, namely:

“Whether, in respect of the second limb of the defence of provocation (namely as to ‘whether the provocation was enough to make a reasonable man do as he did’, Homicide Ordinance, Cap.339, s.4), it is a misdirection of law not to direct the jury to form a discrete view as to the gravity of the provocation on the defendant, having the particular attributes he has, separately from and before determining whether, objectively, having regard to the actual provocation and their view as to its gravity, a person with ordinary powers of self-control would have done what the defendant did?”

2.The appeal will be heard on 11 January 2017.

(R A V Ribeiro)
Permanent Judge
(Robert Tang)
Permanent Judge
(Joseph Fok)
Permanent Judge

Mr Gerard McCoy SC and Mr. Richard Donald, instructed by Tse Yuen Ting Wong, assigned by Director of Legal Aid, for the Applicant

Mr William Tam SC, DDPP and Mr Ivan Cheung PP, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent