Re Smj
|
HCMH 30/2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MENTAL HEALTH CASE NO. 30 OF 2014 ____________
____________
____________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ____________________ Page 8, paragraph 29, line D: “Some practitioners may not be familiar with the subject, but clients are regarded as providers of continuing professional development for the lawyers.” should read as “Some practitioners may not be familiar with the subject, but clients are not regarded as providers of continuing professional development for the lawyers.” Dated the 31st day of May, 2016.
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCMH 30/2014