HKSAR v. Wu Wing Kit and Another
Read the full judgment text of CACC 299/2014 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 26 May 2016.
1. Paragraph 39, lines P-Q: the word “ in ” be inserted after “Having noted that”; and the comma after “McHugh JA” be omitted;
Cites 1 case
|
CACC 299/2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 299 OF 2014 (ON APPEAL FROM DCCC NO. 1022 OF 2012) ____________
____________
______________________ CORRIGENDA ______________________ The following amendments are made to the Judgment dated 26 May 2016: 1. Paragraph 39, lines P-Q: the word “in” be inserted after “Having noted that”; and the comma after “McHugh JA” be omitted; 2. Paragraph 50, line K: the word “became” should read as “becoming”; 3. Paragraph 50, line M: the phrase “there had been” should be changed to “there be”. Dated the 14th day of June 2016.
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under CACC 299/2014