Read the full judgment text of DCEC 494/2014 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 17 June 2016.
1. The respondent runs a chain of fitness centres in Hong Kong. The applicant was employed by the respondent as Fitness Manager at its fitness centre in Central. The fitness centre occupied the 11 th to the 16 th floors of a commercial building. There was a lift specifically reserved for customers of the fitness centre and staff members (including the applicant) could also use it during non-busy hours. However, during busy hours staff members were not allowed to use the lift and they would h
Cited by 2 cases · Cites 8 cases