Liang Pui Saw Kian and Another v. Leung Yuk Chun and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCMP 130/2016 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 15 June 2016.
1. in line Q at paragraph 3 on page 4, “Madam Leung Yuk Chin” should read “Madam Leung Yuk Chun”.
Cites 1 case
|
HCMP 130/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 130 of 2016 ____________________
_______________ CORRIGENDUM _______________ Please kindly note that there are following amendments: 1.in line Q at paragraph 3 on page 4, “Madam Leung Yuk Chin” should read “Madam Leung Yuk Chun”. 2.in line T at paragraph 29 on page 11, “It necessarily follows from the that” should read “It necessarily follows from that”. 3.in line M at paragraph 31 on page 12, “from the date of the of the late Mr Tsui” should read “from the date of the death of the late Mr Tsui”. 4.in line O at paragraph 33 on page 13, “Mirador Mansions” should read “Mirador Mansion”. 5.in line O at paragraph 36 on page 14, “affirmed by your own office.” should read “affirmed by their own office.”. 6.in line L at paragraph 39 on page 15, “30% of the assets, are being used to meet the obligation” should read “30% of the assets, which are being used to meet the obligation”. 7.in line B at paragraph 48 on page 19, “nothing other than they trust” should read “nothing more than the trust”. 8.in line O at paragraph 48 on page 19, “Given the way the trust is required to be set up the purposes of the trust, administration of the state cannot be completed until after the death of the three ladies.” should read “Given the way the trust is required to be set up and the purposes of the trust, administration of the estate cannot be completed until after the death of the three ladies.”. 9.in line B at paragraph 48 on page 20, “There is nothing to stop the Administratrices from making provision or distribution is according to their best judgment in the meantime” should read “There is nothing to stop the administratrices from making provisional distributions according to their best judgment in the meantime”. 10.in line F at paragraph 59 on page 23, “the fall of the order. It is not possible to deal with those batters in this judgement.” should read “the form of the order. It is not possible to deal with those letters in this judgement.”. 11.in line J at paragraph 60 on page 23, “if I am able to deal with matters on paper.” should read “if I am able to deal with the matter on the papers.”. Dated this 23 rd day of June 2016
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCMP 130/2016