Raingate Ltd v. Yetonce Ltd

Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 3540/2015 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 24 June 2016.

1. This is my decision on costs.

Cited by 4 cases

Case No.DCCJ 3540/2015
Court
District Court
Date24 Jun 2016
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

DCCJ 3540/2015

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CIVIL ACTION NO 3540 OF 2015

----------------------

BETWEEN

  RAINGATE LIMITED Plaintiff

and

  YETONCE LIMITED
(僑充有限公司)
1st Defendant

----------------------

Before: Deputy District Judge Sanjay A Sakhrani in Chambers (open to public)
Date of Hearing: 5 April 2016
Plaintiff’s Statement of Costs: 28 April 2016
Date of Decision on Costs: 24 June 2016

---------------------------------

DECISION ON COSTS

---------------------------------

1.This is my decision on costs.

2.In the statement of costs for summary assessment dated 28 April 2016, a total sum of $29,485 is stated to be the plaintiff’s costs of the application for leave to appeal before me.

3.I have not received any response from the 1st defendant’s solicitors to the plaintiff’s statement of costs in spite of my direction and even after my clerk has reminded them by telephone.  Nevertheless, I shall proceed to summarily assess the costs.

4.I allow the following amounts of $110, $3,950, $6,187.50 and $18,000 respectively for Items B (manual work), C (communications), D (professional work) and E (counsel).

5.I have reduced Item D1 by 0.5 hr and Item D2 by 0.25 hour (total HK$1,237.50) for reasons of being excessive.

6.On a nisi basis, therefore, I summarily assess the costs payable to the plaintiff by the 1st defendant in the sum of $28,247.50.

  (Sanjay A Sakhrani)
Deputy District Judge

Messrs Vivien Chan & Co, for the plaintiff

Messrs Lui & Law, for the 1st defendant