Osman Mohammed Arab and Another v. Lam Ying Lung, Alan

Read the full judgment text of HCA 653/2011 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 29 July 2016.

1. in line H at paragraph 22 on page 7, “The Father was an authorised signatory to the Bankrupt’s current account,” should read “The Father was an authorised signatory to the Bankrupt’s Sin Hua current account,”.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 653/2011
Court
High Court CFI
Date29 Jul 2016
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 653/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 653 of 2011

________________________

BETWEEN    
  OSMAN MOHAMMED ARAB and
WONG TAK MAN, STEPHEN
(The Joint and Severally Trustees of the property
of the Bankrupt, namely, Mr LAM YING HO)
Plaintiffs
  and  
  LAM YING LUNG, ALAN (林英龍)
(the personal representative of the estate of LAM SAI CHING, Deceased)
Defendant

________________________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge Saunders in Court
Dates of Hearing: 11 – 13 and 18 May 2016
Last Date of Written Submissions: 30 May 2016
Date of Judgment: 29 July 2016

_______________

CORRIGENDUM

_______________

Please kindly note that there are following amendments:

1.in line H at paragraph 22 on page 7, “The Father was an authorised signatory to the Bankrupt’s current account,” should read “The Father was an authorised signatory to the Bankrupt’s Sin Hua current account,”.

2.in line N at paragraph 31 on page 9, “I understand that the Bankrupt and his family have occupied the property since April 2005.” should read “I understand that the Father and his family have occupied the property since April 2005.”.

3.in line I at paragraph 38 on page 11, “and a Bankruptcy order was granted on that petition on 11 March 2010.” should read “and a Bankruptcy order was granted on that petition on 6 January 2010.”.

4.in line I at paragraph 75 on page 21, “Annie signed a bank mortgage application form asserting ” should read “S S Lam signed a bank mortgage application form asserting”.

5.in line Q at paragraph 77 on page 21, “Annie accepted that she was well educated and understood the importance of a legal document” should read “S S Lam accepted that she was well educated and understood the importance of a legal document”.

6.in line G & H at paragraph 79 on page 22, “Bel‑Air property was beneficially owned by the Bankrupt and his wife and Annie.  Her assertion during the trial, for the first time, that it was a joint investment between herself, S S Lam, the Bankrupt’s wife Ana, and her sister Elena,” should read “Bel‑Air property was beneficially owned by the Bankrupt and his wife and S S Lam.  Her assertion during the trial, for the first time, that it was a joint investment between herself, Annie, the Bankrupt’s wife Ana, and Ana’s sister Elena,”.

Dated this 9th  day of August 2016

  (Thomas WAN)
  Clerk to Deputy High Court Judge Saunders

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCA 653/2011