Read the full judgment text of HCMP 1255/2016 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 15 August 2016 before Hon Cheung and Chu JJA.
Civil procedure – leave to appeal – ancillary relief – consent order – amendment – functus officio – property ownership – Shatin Centre property – District Court Ordinance – Rules of the High Court – SMSE v. KL [2009] 4 HKLRD 125 – 楊德漢及郭蘭珍 (unreported) HCSA 40/2010 – Whether Deputy Judge erred in finding parties agreed Shatin Centre property ownership goes to petitioner – Whether Deputy Judge had power to amend order under Order 20 rule 11 – Leave to appeal refused – Costs ordered – Petitioner's costs assessed at HK$38,000 – Respondent's costs assessed at $1,500
Legal issues: Whether Deputy Judge erred in finding parties agreed Shatin Centre property ownership goes to petitioner · Whether Deputy Judge had power to amend order under Order 20 rule 11
Outcome: Leave to appeal refused. Respondent's summons dismissed.
Cites 2 cases