BabelCite

Marcus Praetorius and Others v. Head Architecture and Design Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCA 1057/2013 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 9 May 2016.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 1057/2013
Court
High Court CFI
Date09 May 2016
Judge—
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 1057/2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 1057 of 2013

__________________

BETWEEN
  MARCUS PRAETORIUS 1st Plaintiff
  JULIA ANNE STEPHENSON 2nd Plaintiff
  CERATEC INTERNATIONAL (HK) LIMITED 3rd Plaintiff
  CERATEC HOLDINGS LIMITED 4th Plaintiff

and
  HEAD ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN LIMITED Defendant
  BARRY DARREN WILSON trading as INITIATIVES Third Party

__________________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge Le Pichon in Chambers
Date of Hearing: 9 May 2016
Date of Decision: 9 May 2016
Date of Handing Down Reasons for Decision: 13 May 2016

__________________

CORRIGENDUM

__________________


Please note the following amendment in the Reasons For Decision dated 13 May 2016:-

Page 12

Line J - L at paragraph 44 should read “Whether an amount is nominal or whether it shows that the plaintiff’s claim has substance will depend on the particular circumstances.”

Dated the 24th day of May 2016

  (Matthew YU)
Clerk to Deputy High Court Judge Le Pichon

Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

Marcus Praetorius and Others v. Head Architecture and Design Ltd
HCA 1057/2013
High Court CFI06 Oct 2016
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCA 1057/2013

Marcus Praetorius and Others v. Head Architecture and Design Ltd
High Court CFI09 May 2016
Marcus Praetorius and Others v. Head Architecture and Design Ltd
High Court CFI06 Oct 2016