Russell Peter Brown and Others v. Edward Eugene Lehman

Read the full judgment text of CACV 119/2012 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 29 July 2016.

1.   In the 2 nd sentence of paragraph 6 on page 3, “Messrs. Howse Williams Bowers” should be inserted immediately after the phrase “an affidavit of Miss Greene, an assistant solicitor in the employ of the plaintiffs’ former solicitors”.

Cites 1 case

Case No.CACV 119/2012
Court
Court of Appeal
Date29 Jul 2016
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 119/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO 119 OF 2012

(ON APPEAL FROM HCA 959 OF 2010)

---------------------------

BETWEEN
  RUSSELL PETER BROWN 1st Plaintiff
  ZHOU HAN BROWN (also known as ZHOU HAN) 2nd Plaintiff
  EFFISCIENT LIMITED 3rd Plaintiff
(Respondents)
   
and
  EDWARD EUGENE LEHMAN
Defendant
(Appellant)

---------------------------

Before: Hon Lunn VP, Barma JA and McWalters JA in Court
Date of Hearing: 13 June 2013 and 22 July 2014
Date of Judgment: 29 July 2016
Date of Corrigendum: 31 August 2016

_____________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

_____________________


Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 29 July 2016:

1.   In the 2nd sentence of paragraph 6 on page 3, “Messrs. Howse Williams Bowers” should be inserted immediately after the phrase “an affidavit of Miss Greene, an assistant solicitor in the employ of the plaintiffs’ former solicitors”.

2.   In the 1st line of paragraph 8 on page 4, “Thereafter, on 14 November 2011, the defendant...” should read "Thereafter, on 14 December 2011, the defendant...”.

3.   In the 10th line of paragraph 9 on page 4, "The defendant unsuccessfully..." should read "The defendant successfully...".



  (S.K. Mak)
Clerk to Hon Barma JA