Lam See Yan v. Sze Ching Lok and Others

Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 3792/2016 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 10 November 2016.

1.  Paragraph 8(c) at p.4C, “alternations” should read “alterations”.

Cites 1 case

Case No.DCCJ 3792/2016
Court
District Court
Date10 Nov 2016
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

DCCJ 3792/2016

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CIVIL ACTION NO 3792 OF 2016

--------------------

BETWEEN
  LAM SEE YAN Plaintiff
and
  SZE CHING LOK (施政樂 alias 施建延) 1st Defendant
  HONG KONG GAME THEORYASSOCIATION LIMITED
(香港博奕研究協會有限公司)
2nd Defendant
  ALL OTHER OCCUPIERS OF FLAT B ON THE TENTH FLOOR OF NO 523 NATHAN ROAD, KOWLOON, HONG KONG 3rd Defendant

--------------------

Before: His Honour Judge Andrew Li in Chambers (Open to public)
Date of Hearing: 14 October 2016
Date of Decision: 10 November 2016

________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

________________________


Please note the following amendments in the Judgment handed down on 10.11.2016:

1.  Paragraph 8(c) at p.4C, “alternations” should read “alterations”.

2.  Paragraph 14 at p.5C-D, “demanded that” should read “demanded the”.

3.  Paragraph 15 at p.5J, “resident” should read “residence”, “or” should read “for”, “tenancy” should read “tenants” and “occupied” should read “occupiers”.

4.  Paragraph 32 at p.10G-H, “produced a receipt” should read “produced copy of a receipt”.

5.  Paragraph 32 at p.10H, “who had received” should read “who had allegedly received”.

6.  Paragraph 32 at p.10J, “on the receipt” should read “on the copy receipt”.

7.  Paragraph 34 at p.11D, “with” should read “which”.

8.  Paragraph 35(d) at p.12D-E, “allowed that the tenant” should read “allowed the tenant to”.

9.  Paragraph 38 at p.12S, “Giving” should read “Given”.

10.  Paragraph 38 at p.13B-C, “are served out of time and without leave” should read “are not served but filed out of time and without leave”.

11.  Paragraph 38 at p.13C, “Taken” should read “Taking”.

12.  Paragraph 39 at p.13G-J, “to file” should read “to serve and file”.

13.  Paragraph 42 at p.14G-H, “had” should read “have” and “cost of the air-conditioners” should read “replacement cost of the air-conditioners for which the Plaintiff is allegedly responsible”.

14.  Paragraph 43 at p.14J, “subject to” should read “apart from the court order for”.

15.  Paragraph 44(1) at p.15H, “order to ask” should read “order to require” and at p.15J, “the plaintiff represented” should read “the plaintiff’s representative”.

16.  Paragraph 44(1) at p.15J-K, “14 days” should read “7 days”.

17.  Paragraph 48 at p.16L-M, “leave to the 1st and 2nd Defendants to file” should read “leave to the 1st and 2nd Defendants to serve and file”.


Dated the 24th day of November 2016



  (Y. Y. LAI)
Clerk to His Honour Judge Andrew Li

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under DCCJ 3792/2016