Read the full judgment text of CACV 219/2016 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 9 March 2017.
4. The applicant’s case set out in her first affirmation in support of the application is a simple one. She referred to the correspondence with the 2 nd respondent’s solicitors who stated that New Lin Fung was set up by the 2 nd respondent to continue the operation of Old Lin Fung and that the 2 nd respondent held New Lin Fung on trust for the estate. Since she has replaced the 2 nd respondent as the administrator of the estate, he ought to transfer New Lin Fung to her.
Cites 1 case