HKSAR v. Singh Gurmail
Read the full judgment text of DCCC 736/2016 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 28 February 2017.
Cited by 2 cases
|
DCCC 736/2016 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION CRIMINAL ACTION NO 736 OF 2016 ---------------------------------
---------------------------------
-------------------------------------- REASONS FOR SENTENCE -------------------------------------- On the last occasion, I have passed a sentence in a total of 30 months imprisonment on you, but there was an oversight on my part. In fact, you on that day were already serving a sentence of 4 months in the case of KCCC 575/2007. I was told that that case is a charge of going equipped for stealing. The date, the time and the place of that offence are different from the charges that you are sentenced on by this court. In principle, all the sentences, 30 months, will have to run totally consecutive to those 4 months. But having considered the totality principle, I order that 29 months out of the 30 months I passed on you in this case is to run consecutive to the 4 months’ imprisonment in the KC case.
|
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under DCCC 736/2016