383hk Ltd v. The Incorporated Owners of Tak Bo Building

Read the full judgment text of HCA 1333/2011 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 24 March 2017.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 1333/2011
Court
High Court CFI
Date24 Mar 2017
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 1333/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 1333 OF 2011

________________________

BETWEEN    
  383HK LIMITED Plaintiff
  and  
    THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF TAK BO BUILDING Defendant

________________________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge Burrell in Court
Dates of Hearing:6 - 10 and 14 March 2017
Date of Judgment: 24 March 2017

________________________

C O R R I G E N D A

________________________

Please note the following corrigenda in the Judgment of the above-mentioned case handed down on 24 March 2017:-

At page 19, between line F and G, paragraph 45(7) “The plaintiff’s second witness of fact, Mr Wu Kun Wa” should be substituted by “The defendant’s second witness of fact, Mr Wu Kin Wa”
At page 30, line N, paragraph 78 “August 2011 the property was empty for 13 months” should be substituted by “June 2012 the property was empty for 22 months”

Dated the 12th day of May 2017.


  (Cynthia Ng)
  Clerk to Deputy High Court Judge Burrell

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCA 1333/2011