HKSAR v. Choi Yee Hung, Brendy

Read the full judgment text of CACC 357/2014 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 13 June 2017.

1. On 24 March 2017 we delivered our judgment allowing the 2 nd applicant’s appeal and quashing her conviction of unlawfully trafficking in dangerous drugs. We ordered a retrial on a fresh indictment.

Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.CACC 357/2014
Court
Court of Appeal
Date13 Jun 2017
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACC 357/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 357OF 2014

(ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO. 491 OF 2013)

____________

BETWEEN
  HKSAR Respondent
  and
  CHOI YEE HUNG, BRENDY (蔡爾虹) 2nd Applicant

____________

Before: Hon Lunn VP, Macrae and McWalters JJA
Date of written submissions: 5 and 7 June 2017
Date of Judgment: 13 June 2017

________________________

J U D G M E N T

________________________

Hon Lunn VP (giving the Judgment of the Court) :

1.On 24 March 2017 we delivered our judgment allowing the 2nd applicant’s appeal and quashing her conviction of unlawfully trafficking in dangerous drugs. We ordered a retrial on a fresh indictment.

2.We are satisfied, having regard to the fact that the respondent does not oppose the application made on behalf of the 2nd applicant in a letter to the Court dated 5 June 2017 for an order of costs in her favour to the extent of her contribution and liability to make a contribution to the Legal Aid Department in respect of the legal aid granted to her for legal representation at her trial and her appeal respectively, that it is appropriate to make the orders sought.

3.It is better practice that the application should be made or notice given of the application upon the judgment of the Court of Appeal being pronounced.[1]  It is “much more preferable” that the application is made at that time and, “If not, unless there be good reason, costs of the late application may not be awarded.”  Nevertheless, it is clear that there is jurisdiction in this court to make the order[2].

4.Having regard to the circumstances of this case, we make an order against the respondent that the 2nd applicant is to have her costs of $60,276, which contribution she made to the Legal Aid Department in respect of the trial, and $45,608, which liability she has to the Legal Aid Department in respect of her appeal.

(Michael Lunn)
Vice President
(Andrew Macrae)
Justice of Appeal
(Ian McWalters)
Justice of Appeal

Mr Eddie Sean, SADPP, of the Department of Justice, for the respondent

Mr Jeremy Cheung, instructed by Morley Chow Seto, assigned by the Director of Legal Aid, for the 2nd applicant



[1] The Queen v Kwok Moon Yan & Others (CACC 347 & 500/1988; unreported, 27 June 1989 at page 10).

[2] The Queen v Tsui Ching Kwai (CACC 554/1988; unreported, 28 June 1989 at page 4).

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACC 357/2014