Cheung Kit Mui v. Bayview Mansion Management Committee of Incorporated Owners of Bayview Mansion

Read the full judgment text of CACV 240/1996 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 21 February 1997.

1. By section 11(2) of the Lands Tribunal Ordinance, Cap. 17 the jurisdiction of this Court arises if but only if there is an appeal based upon a point of law. We have heard Mr. CHAN Wing Wai who appears for the appellant, his wife, and we have heard Madam CHAN Fung Ling on behalf of the respondent, the Bayview Mansion Management Committee. Having heard them and having examined the documents put before us once more, we are quite unable to see that any point of law arises at all.

Case No.CACV 240/1996
Court
Court of Appeal
Date21 Feb 1997
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV000240/1996

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1996, No. 240
(Civil)

______________

BETWEEN
CHEUNG Kit Mui Plaintiff/
Applicant
AND
Bayview Mansion Management
Committee of Incorporated
Owners of Bayview Mansion
Defendant/
Respondent

______________

Coram: Hon. Litton, V-P, Bokhary and Ching, JJ.A. in Court

Date of hearing: 21 February 1997

Date of judgment: 21 February 1997

______________

J U D G M E N T

______________

Ching, J.A. (delivering the judgment of the Court) :

1. By section 11(2) of the Lands Tribunal Ordinance, Cap. 17 the jurisdiction of this Court arises if but only if there is an appeal based upon a point of law. We have heard Mr. CHAN Wing Wai who appears for the appellant, his wife, and we have heard Madam CHAN Fung Ling on behalf of the respondent, the Bayview Mansion Management Committee. Having heard them and having examined the documents put before us once more, we are quite unable to see that any point of law arises at all.

2. In those circumstances we must dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

(Henry Litton) (K. Bokhary) (Charles Ching)
Vice President Justice of Appeal Justice of Appeal

Representation:

Mr. CHAN Wing Wai, representative of the Appellant

Madam CHAN Fung Ling, representative of the Defendant