Zhang Hong Li and Others v. Dbs Bank (Hong Kong) Ltd and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCCL 2/2011 on BabelCite. This HCCL judgment was delivered on 13 April 2017.

1. Page 351, paragraph 425 and line F, “…that value might have been on 11 February 2011 if Wise Lords…” should read as “…that value might have been on 28 February 2011 if Wise Lords…”.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCCL 2/2011
Court
HCCL
Date13 Apr 2017
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCL 2/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

COMMERCIAL ACTION NO 2 OF 2011

______________________

BETWEEN

  ZHANG HONG LI 1st Plaintiff
  JI ZHENGRONG 2nd Plaintiff
  BRUNO ARBOIT and RODERICK JOHN SUTTON 3rd Plaintiffs
  (suing in their capacity as the current Trustees of the Amsun Trust)  
  WISE LORDS LIMITED 4th Plaintiff

and

  DBS BANK (HONG KONG) LIMITED 1st Defendant
  NAUTILUS TRUSTEES ASIA LIMITED 2nd Defendant
  (formerly DBS TRUSTEE H.K. (JERSEY) LIMITED)  
  (in their capacity as the former Trustee of the Amsun Trust)  
  DBS CORPORATE SERVICES (HONG KONG) LIMITED 3rd Defendant
  DHJ MANAGEMENT LIMITED 4th Defendant
  LEE KWOK TAI, PETER 5th Defendant
  LIM LEUNG YAU, EDWIN 6th Defendant
  LIU HIU HONG, LINDA 7th Defendant

______________________

Before: Hon Bharwaney J in Court
Dates of Hearing: 26-30 May 2014, 4-6, 9-12, 17-19, 23-24 June 2014,
  7-8, 10 July 2014, 23, 26 September 2014, and 29-30 October 2014
Dates of Defendants' Note on Queries raised by Court and Further Correspondence Exchanged: 6 and 11 November 2014
Date of Judgment: 13 April 2017

________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

________________________

Kindly note that the following corrections in the Judgment handed down by the Honourable Mr Justice Bharwaney on 13 April 2017:

1.Page 351, paragraph 425 and line F, “…that value might have been on 11 February 2011 if Wise Lords…” should read as “…that value might have been on 28 February 2011 if Wise Lords…”.

2.Page 374, paragraph 479 and lines Q, “…in these proceedings on 11 February 2011; and, secondly, setting out their opinion on what that value might have been on 11 February 2011 if…” should read as “…in these proceedings on 28 February 2011; and, secondly, setting out their opinion on what that value might have been on 28 February 2011 if …”.

Dated this 22 June 2017

     (Jessica P.W. To)
  Clerk to the Honourable Mr. Justice Bharwaney