Read the full judgment text of CACC 495/2012 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 16 August 2017.
1. D1 and D2 are jointly charged with one count of Blackmail (Charge 1), contrary to section 23(1) and (3) of the Theft Ordinance, Cap 210. D1 is further charged with another count of Blackmail (Charge 2). Both D1 and D2 pleaded not guilty to the charges. After the trial, D1 was convicted of both Charge 1 and Charge 2 while D2 was convicted of Charge 1.
Cites 3 cases