Yu v. So
Read the full judgment text of FCDJ 3947/1987 on BabelCite. This FCDJ judgment was delivered on 29 July 2014.
1. In the third line of paragraph 24 on page 10 of the judgment, “…in his supporting affidavit, but from which one can see that he is still occupying the tin yat (sic) of the wife’s property, …” should be amended as “…in his supporting affidavit, but from which one can see that he is still occupying the roof of the wife’s property, …”
|
[English Translation – 英譯本] FCDJ3947/1987 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MATRIMONIAL CAUSES NO. 3947 OF 1987 ________________________
________________________
______________ Corrigendum ______________ 1.In the third line of paragraph 24 on page 10 of the judgment, “…in his supporting affidavit, but from which one can see that he is still occupying the tin yat (sic) of the wife’s property, …” should be amended as “…in his supporting affidavit, but from which one can see that he is still occupying the roof of the wife’s property, …”
Translated by the Judgment Translation Unit of the Judiciary and vetted by Mr. P. Y. Lo, Barrister-at-law. |
Further hearings and rulings under FCDJ 3947/1987