Rai Raj Kumar v. Pacific Crown Security Services Ltd and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCPI 312/2016 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 21 August 2017.

1. In line I – J at paragraph 72 on page 19,

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCPI 312/2016
Court
High Court CFI
Date21 Aug 2017
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCPI 312/2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO 312 OF 2016

___________

BETWEEN
  RAI RAJ KUMAR Plaintiff
and
  PACIFIC CROWN SECURITY SERVICES LIMITED 1st Defendant
  DRAGAGES–CHINA HARBOUR–VSL JOINT VENTURE 2nd Defendant
  BAUER HONG KONG LIMITED 3rd Defendant

___________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge Sakhrani in Court

Dates of Hearing: 31 July and 2 August 2017

Date of Judgment: 21 August 2017

Date of Corrigendum: 13 October 2017

____________________

CORRIGENDUM

____________________


Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 21 August 2017:

1.In line I – J at paragraph 72 on page 19,

“ The multiplicand is the said sum of $37,574 per month.”

should read:

“ The multiplicand is the sum of $22,713 per month.”

2.In line F – H at paragraph 76 on page 20,

“ The multiplicand should be $20,924 ($37,574 − $4,000 − $12,650).

$20,924 × 12 × 11.65 = $ 2,925,175.

I would award loss of future earnings at $2,925,175.”

should read:

“ The multiplicand should be $22,713 ($39,363 − $4,000 − $12,650).

$22,713 × 12 × 11.65 = $ 3,175,277.

I would award loss of future earnings at $3,175,277.”

3.In line E at paragraph 80 on page 21,

“ (d) Loss of future earnings $ 2,925,175 ”

should read:

“ (d) Loss of future earnings $ 3,175,277 ”

4.In line I at paragraph 80 on page 21,

“ Total $ 4,325,275.30 ”

should read:  

“ Total $ 4,575,377.30 ”

5.In line M at paragraph 82 on page 21,

“ I give judgment to P against the defendants for the said sum of $4,325,275.30 with interest as set out above.”

should read:

“ I give judgment to P against the defendants for the said sum of $4,575,377.30 with interest as set out above.”

  (Thomas WAN)
  Clerk to Deputy High Court Judge Sakhrani

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCPI 312/2016