Read the full judgment text of CACC 45/2017 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 11 October 2017.
1. The applicant appeared in the District Court charged with 8 charges. The 1 st charge was theft of two credit cards, contrary to section 9 of the Theft Ordinance, Cap 210. The 2 nd to 6 th charges were obtaining property by deception, contrary to section 17(1) of the Theft Ordinance, Cap 210 and involved the use of the stolen credit cards that were the subject of the 1 st charge, to fraudulently purchase goods. The 7 th and 8 th charges were attempting to obtain property by deception, contrary
Cited by 3 cases · Cites 1 case