Hong Dau Construction Co Ltd v. The Incorporated Owners of Garden Vista

HCA 2290/2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. 2290 OF 2016

____________

____________

________________

CORRIGENDUM

________________

Please note that the following corrections in the Decision handed down by Deputy High Court Judge Kent Yee on 8 September 2017:

1.Page 2, paragraph 4 and line K to L, “The purposes …” should read as “For the purposes …”.

2.Page 4, paragraph 8 and line P, “our” should read as “are”.

3.Page 9, paragraph 20 and line N to O, “facts” should read as “fact”.

4.Page 12, paragraph 28 and line K, “… the preent case …” should read as “… the present case …”, and “Lai” should read as “Yau”.

5.Page 12, paragraph 28 and line M to N, “… involving Lai …” should read as “… involving Yau …”.

6.Page 12, paragraph 29 and line P, “Lai” should read as “Yau”.

7.Page 12, paragraph 29 and line R to S, “Lai” should read as “Yau”.

8.Page 13, paragraph 30 and line D, “Lai’s convictions” should read as “Yau’s convictions”.

9.Page 13, paragraph 30 and line D to E, “... his conviction was” should read as “… his convictions were”, and “Lai was convicted of …” should read as “Yau was convicted of …”.

10.Page 13, paragraph 32 and line O, “Lai” should read as “Yau”.

11.Page 13, paragraph 33 and line S to T, “Lai” should read as “Yau”.

12.Page 14, paragraph 34 and line E to F, “Lai” should read as “Yau”.

13.Page 14, paragraph 35 and line H to I, “Lai” should read as “Yau”.

14.Page 14, paragraph 35 and line I to J, “Lai’s convictions” should read as “Yau’s convictions”.

15.Page 14, paragraph 35 and line J, “Lai” should read as “Yau”.

16.Page 14, paragraph 36 and line K to L, “Lai” should read as “Yau”.

17.Page 14, paragraph 36 and line M to N, “Lai” should read as “Yau”.

18.Page 15, paragraph 38 and line J, “Lai” should read as “Yau”.

Dated this 18^th day of October 2017.