HKSAR v. Ho Sai Keong

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 576/2014 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment.

1. Page 18, line R should read as “ A salient feature of D W2’s evidence is that during the lunch meeting he had with the appellant, ”

Case No.HCMA 576/2014
Court
High Court CFI
Date
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMA576/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO HCMA576/2014

(ON APPEAL FROM TMCC1285 OF 2014)

--------------------------

HKSAR
Respondent
and
HO SAI KEONG Appellant

--------------------------

Before : Deputy High Court Judge Johnny Chan
Date of Hearing : 15/06/2017
Date of Judgment : 20/10/2017

CORRIGENDUM

Kindly note that the following correction in the Judgment handed down by The Deputy High Court Judge Johnny Chan on 20/10/2017:

1.Page 18, line R should read as “A salient feature of DW2’s evidence is that during the lunch meeting he had with the appellant,

Dated the 30 October 2017

  (Alice Yip)
  Clerk to DHCJ Johnny CHAN

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCMA 576/2014