Read the full judgment text of HCA 1822/2013 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 8 August 2017.
1. There are three matters before me, namely summonses in respect of three protective writs issued by the Plaintiff, being a company in liquidation (“CMED”) against the Defendant, KPMG Hong Kong (“KPMG”), in HCA 1822/2013 (“the 1 st KPMG Protective Writ”), HCA 1138/2014 (“the 2 nd KPMG Protective Writ”) and HCA 2276/2016 (“the 3 rd KPMG Protective Writ”) (collectively, “the Protective Writs”). KPMG was the former auditor of CMED. The Protective Writs seek to preserve possible claims against KPMG
Cites 1 case