Makhssian Trajan Vahe v. Iss Eastpoint Property Management Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCA 2395/2016 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 5 December 2017.

1.  The word “Makhassian” as shown in the Judgment should read “Makhssian”.

Cites 2 cases

Case No.HCA 2395/2016
Court
High Court CFI
Date05 Dec 2017
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 2395/2016 & HCA 43/2017
(Heard together)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. 2395 OF 2016

_____________

BETWEEN
  MAKHSSIAN TRAJAN VAHE Plaintiff
and
  ISS EASTPOINT PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LIMITED Defendant

_____________

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. 43 OF 2017

_____________

BETWEEN
  MAKHSSIAN TRAJAN VAHE Plaintiff
and
  HONG KONG CYBERPORT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED Defendant

_____________

Before: Hon Lok J in Chambers

Dates of Hearing: 18 May & 17 October 2017

Date of Decision: 5 December 2017

Date of Corrigendum: 21 December 2017

_________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

_________________________


Please note the following Corrigendum in the Judgment dated 5 December 2017:-

1.  The word “Makhassian” as shown in the Judgment should read “Makhssian”.

2.  In page 5, paragraph 12, “whatapp” should read “whatsapp”.

3.  In page 9, paragraph 23, “Mahkssian” should read “Makhssian”.


Dated the 21st day of December 2017.  


  (Wong Ho Yin, Tox)
  for Registrar, High Court