Naibu (H.K.) International Investment Ltd and Others v. The Registrar of Companies and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 534/2016 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 12 January 2018.

1. I am satisfied on the material before the court, including the Statement of the Registrar of Companies filed on 11 April 2016, that the 2 nd to 4 th Applicants have not resigned from their directorship of the 1 st Applicant (Company) and the three Form ND4 purportedly giving notice of such resignation contain forged signatures of the 2 nd to 4 th Applicants.

Case No.HCMP 534/2016[2018] HKCFI 64
Court
High Court CFI
Date12 Jan 2018
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP 534/2016
[2018] HKCFI 64

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 534 OF 2016

___________________

  IN THE MATTER OF NAIBU (H.K.) INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LIMITED
 
 
  AND IN THE MATTER OF s42 OF THE COMPANIES ORDINANCE (CAP 622)  

__________________

BETWEEN
  NAIBU (H.K.) INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LIMITED 1st Applicant
  STEPHEN WEN PING CHEUNG 2nd Applicant
  GILES RODERICK MCGREGOR ELLIOTT 3rd Applicant
  DAVID ALBERT THOMAS 4th Applicant
  AND
  THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES 1st Respondent
  LIN HUOYAN 2nd Respondent
  LIN ZHENZHI 3rd Respondent
  LIN CONGDENG 4th Respondent

Before: Hon Anthony Chan J in Chambers

Date of Hearing: 12 January 2018

Date of Decision: 12 January 2018

_______________

D E C I S I O N

_______________


1.I am satisfied on the material before the court, including the Statement of the Registrar of Companies filed on 11 April 2016, that the 2nd to 4th Applicants have not resigned from their directorship of the 1st Applicant (Company) and the three Form ND4 purportedly giving notice of such resignation contain forged signatures of the 2nd to 4th Applicants.

2.Each of these Form ND4 and the Form ND2A, which purported to give notice that the 2nd to 4th Applicants had ceased to be directors of the Company and that the 2nd Respondent had been appointed as a director of the Company, therefore contains false or invalid information.

3.I am satisfied that the Company has, and will continue to, suffer material damage due to the presence of the false information on the Companies Register.  There is no suggestion that anyone is interested to have the information preserved in the Register.

4.In the premise, I grant the order sought in para 31 of the written submissions of the Applicants as amended.

  (Anthony Chan)
  Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Ms Ifan Chan, instructed by S T Cheng & Co, for 1st to 4th Applicants

Attendance of the 1st Respondent was excused

The 2nd Respondent was not represented and did not appear

The 3rd Respondent was not represented and did not appear

The 4th Respondent was not represented and did not appear