Vu Van Khanh v. 香港入境處處長

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 843/2017 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 24 January 2018.

Cited by 1 case

Case No.HCAL 843/2017[2018] HKCFI 135
Court
High Court CFI
Date24 Jan 2018
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL843/2017

[2018] HKCFI 135

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST No. 843 of 2017

BETWEEN
  Vu Van Khanh Applicant
  and
  香港入境處處長 Putative Respondent

Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
NOTIFICATION of the Judge’s decision (Ord. 53 r. 3)

Following;

consideration of the documents only;    or
consideration of the documents and oral submissions by the Applicant
or counsel [                ] in open court;


Order by the Honourable Mr Justice Chow:

Leave to apply for Judicial Review dismissed.

Observations for the Applicant:

The application for leave to apply for judicial review is dismissed on the ground that the Notice of Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review (Form 86) dated 3 November 2017 fails to identify (i) any decision made by the Director of Immigration (the Putative Respondent) in respect of which relief is sought, (ii) the grounds on which any relief is sought, and (iii) any relief which the court in the exercise of its jurisdiction in judicial review can grant.  The Applicant’s Affirmation filed in support of the application dated 3 November 2017 also does not show that the Director of Immigration has made any relevant decision, whether to repatriate the Applicant or otherwise, which can properly form the subject matter of an application for judicial review.



Dated the 24th day of January 2018.
(Sunny Ng)
for Registrar, High Court


Where leave to apply has been granted, Applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of their application in the light of the Respondent’s evidence


Notes for the Applicant:
 
 
If leave has been granted, the Applicant or his solicitors must:
a) serve on the respondent and such interested parties as may be directed by the Court the order granting leave and any directions given within 14 days after the leave was granted(Order 53, rule 4A); Sent/Handed to the Applicant/
the Applicant’s solicitors on
25/01/2018

Vu Van Khanh
The Applicant
Sent/Handed to the Putative Respondent/
the Putative Respondent’s solicitors / such Putative Interested Parties as may be directed by the Court / the Putative Interested Parties’ solicitors on
25/01/2018

香港入境處處長
The Putative Respondent
b) issue the originating summons within 14 days after the grant of leave and serve it in accordance with Order 53, rule 5; and
c) supply to every other party copies of every affidavit which the Applicant proposes to use at the hearing, including the affidavit in support of the application for leave (Order 53, rule 6(5)).

Form CALL-1

Cited by 1 case

Other judgments that cite this case