Prem Singh v. The Director of Immigration
Read the full judgment text of CACV 260/2001 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 24 January 2002.
1. We are not satisfied that the two questions which have been raised referred to issues which are of great and general importance. Leave is accordingly refused.
Cited by 2 cases
|
CACV000260A/2001 CACV 260/2001 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO. 260 OF 2001 (ON APPEAL FROM HCAL 1379 OF 2000) ______________
______________ Coram: Hon Mayo VP, Woo JA and Lugar-Mawson J in Court Date of Hearing: 24 January 2002 Date of Decision: 24 January 2002 ______________ D E C I S I O N ______________ Hon Mayo VP (giving the decision of the Court): 1.We are not satisfied that the two questions which have been raised referred to issues which are of great and general importance. Leave is accordingly refused. 2.Costs to the respondent on this application and the applicant's costs to be taxed in accordance with Legal Aid Regulations.
Representation: Mr Kwok Sui-hay, instructed by Messrs Barnes & Daly, for the applicant. Mr Joseph Fok, SC and Mr Daniel H.T. Wan, instructed by Department of Justice, for the respondent. |
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 260/2001