Law Ching Yu v. Cheng Kwok Wing Leo t/a Security Consultant & Engineering Co.

Read the full judgment text of DCEC 2750/2015 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 15 February 2018.

64. It is therefore ordered that paras [3] [(a)] [(c)] , [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] , [11] and [12] be struck out from the Answer.  This order is on a nisi basis, and stands absolute within 14 days if not application is made to vary it.”

Cites 2 cases

Case No.DCEC 2750/2015[2018] HKDC 140
Court
District Court
Date15 Feb 2018
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

DCEC 2750/2015
[2018] HKDC 140

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION CASE NO 2750 OF 2015

-------------------------

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BETWEEN
 
  LAW CHING YU (羅靜如) Applicant
  and
  CHENG KWOK WING LEO trading as SECURITY CONSULTANT & ENGINEERING CO.
(鄭國榮 經營 保安顧問工程公司)
Respondent

-------------------------

Before: HH Judge Levy in Chambers

Dates of Hearing: 10 May 2017 and 9 January 2018

Date of Handing Down Decision: 15 February 2018

Date of Corrigendum: 15 February 2018

-------------------------

CORRIGENDUM

-------------------------


Please note the following corrigendum in the Decision dated 15 February 2018: -

Paragraphs 63 and 64 at page 21 should read as follows: -

“63. Having regard to the statutory objectives and the letter and spirt of the EC Rules mandating for procedural simplicity, I’m inclined to exercise the court’s case management powers on my own motion by making an order that those irrelevant and offending parts of the Answer discussed in the preceding paragraph be struck out.

64. It is therefore ordered that paras [3] [(a)] [(c)], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [11] and [12] be struck out from the Answer.  This order is on a nisi basis, and stands absolute within 14 days if not application is made to vary it.”

Dated the 15thday of February 2018.



  (FAN Tsz Chun, Craig)
  Clerk to Her Honour Judge Levy