Huang Li v. Hady Hartanto and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCA 2322/2014 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 6 February 2018.

1. Paragraph 32 of the Decision should read “ Costs should follow the event and I order the 1 st and 2 nd defendants to pay the plaintiff’s costs of the application, with a certificate for two counsel. ”

Cited by 3 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 2322/2014[2018] HKCFI 237
Court
High Court CFI
Date06 Feb 2018
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 2322/2014

[2018] HKCFI 237

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 2322 OF 2014

________________________

BETWEEN
  HUANG LI (黃莉) Plaintiff
and
  HADY HARTANTO (黃志煌) 1st Defendant
  TELEMEDIA PACIFIC GROUP LIMITED 2nd Defendant
  NEXT-GENERATION SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED 3rd Defendant
  (新一代卫星通讯有限公司)  

________________________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge Cooney SC in Chambers
Date of Hearing: 22 January 2018
Date of Decision: 6 February 2018

________________________

CORRIGENDUM

________________________


1.Paragraph 32 of the Decision should read “Costs should follow the event and I order the 1st and 2nd defendants to pay the plaintiff’s costs of the application, with a certificate for two counsel.

Dated the 9th day of March 2018.

  (Sunny Ng)
  Clerk to Deputy High Court Judge Cooney SC