Ho Kwok Hing v. Lam Tai Hing Tso and Others

HCA 694/2017

[2018] HKCFI 378

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. 694 OF 2017

____________

____________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge N Francis in Chambers

Date of Hearing: 25 January 2018

Date of Decision: 2 March 2018

___________________

CORRIGENDUM

___________________

Page 2, Paragraph 2 Lines I to K:

“In summary, the principle relief claimed by the plaintiff in the action is a right of way over Lot 813 in order to access Lot 814, which as the numbering suggests is directly adjacent.” should be changed to “In summary, the principal relief claimed by the plaintiff in the action is a right of way over Lot 813 in order to access Lot 814, which as the numbering suggests is directly adjacent.”

Page 18, Paragraph 37 Lines C to E:

“While it is clear that the plaintiff has much to do as regards pursuing his claim for adverse possession in respect of Lot 814, I cannot conclude, as counsel for the defendants suggests, that he is no genuine intention to pursue the claim.” should be changed to “While it is clear that the plaintiff has much to do as regards pursuing his claim for adverse possession in respect of Lot 814, I cannot conclude, as counsel for the defendants suggests, that he has no genuine intention to pursue the claim.”

Page 19, Paragraph 40 Lines I to J:

“I also note that the defendants evidence is entirely silent as regards their present or future plans for use of Lot 813.” should be changed to “I also note that the defendants’ evidence is entirely silent as regards their present or future plans for use of Lot 813.”

Dated the 21^st day of March 2018