Read the full judgment text of CACV 14/2017 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 2 May 2018 before Lam VP, Poon JA.
Civil procedure – intervention – leave to intervene – proper person to be heard – QT test – human trafficking – forced labour – Hong Kong Bill of Rights Article 4 – applicant claimed to be victim of human trafficking; judicial review allowed; respondents appealed – charitable institution applied to intervene – whether intended intervener was proper person to be heard – application refused because intervener would substantially repeat existing party's submissions and would not provide a more rounded picture – application refused; directions on costs
Legal issues: Application for leave to intervene in appeal
Outcome: Application for leave to intervene refused.
Cited by 2 cases · Cites 2 cases