Read the full judgment text of CACC 368/2016 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 12 June 2018.
1. The 1 st applicant (D1 at trial) was charged with living on the earnings of prostitution of others, contrary to section 137(1) of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap 200 (Charge 1); while the 2 nd applicant (D2 at trial) was charged with aiding, abetting, counselling and procuring the 1 st applicant’s commission of the offence, contrary to the same provisions and section 89 of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance, Cap 221 (Charge 2) [1] . The applicants both pleaded not guilty to the charges they faced. On
Cited by 4 cases · Cites 1 case