BabelCite

HKSAR v. Lo Pui Yi Cat

Read the full judgment text of CACC 78/2016 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 21 December 2017.

Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.CACC 78/2016[2018] HKCA 236
Court
Court of Appeal
Date21 Dec 2017
Judge—
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACC 78/2016

[2018] HKCA 236

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 78 OF 2016

(ON APPEAL FROM DCCC 894 OF 2015)

------------------------

BETWEEN

  HKSAR Respondent
and
  LO PUI YI CAT (羅佩怡) Appellant

------------------------

Before: Hon Lunn VP, McWalters JA and Poon JA in Court

Dates of Hearing: 19-21 December 2017

Date of Judgment: 21 December 2017

Date of Reasons for Judgment: 2 May 2018

__________________________

CORRIGENDUM

__________________________

The paragraph 10 on page 3 Line R,

“However, she testified in the trial the prosecution was unable to elicit…”

should read

“However, when she testified in the trial the prosecution was unable to elicit…”

The paragraph 85 on page 33 Line P,

“…Ms Li and the secondly which only arises if he should…”

should read

“…Ms Li and the second, which only arises if he should…”

Dated this 21st day of June, 2018.

(Isabella Kwan)
Clerk to Hon McWalters JA

Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

HKSAR v. Lo Pui Yi Cat
CACC 78/2016
Court of Appeal21 Dec 2017
Cited by 2 cases

Other judgments that cite this case

HKSAR v. Lo Pui Yi Cat
Court of Appeal21 Dec 2017
HKSAR v. Lo Pui Yi Cat (羅佩怡)
FAMC19 Nov 2019
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACC 78/2016

HKSAR v. Lo Pui Yi Cat
Court of Appeal30 Aug 2017
HKSAR v. Lo Pui Yi Cat
Court of Appeal21 Dec 2017