Baosteel Engineering & Technology Group Co Ltd v. China Zenith Chemical Group Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCCT 7/2018 on BabelCite. This 高等法院原訟法庭 judgment was delivered on 18 July 2018 before Hon Mimmie Chan J.

Arbitration — Enforcement of arbitral awards — Application under Sections 84 and 92 of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap 609) — Case involves Baosteel Engineering & Technology Group Company Limited applying to enforce an arbitral award against China Zenith Chemical Group Limited — Hearing held on 11 July 2018 before Hon Mimmie Chan J in chambers — Reasons for decision issued on 18 July 2018 — Correction issued regarding typographical error in the Reasons for Decision on 23 July 2018 — No detailed legal issues or outcome disclosed in the text provided — Case illustrates procedural aspects of enforcement applications under the Arbitration Ordinance.

Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCCT 7/2018[2018] HKCFI 1678
Court
高等法院原訟法庭
Date18 Jul 2018
JudgeHon Mimmie Chan J
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCT 7/2018

[2018] HKCFI 1678

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTRUCTION AND ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS

NO 7 OF 2018

______________

  IN THE MATTER of an arbitration between Baosteel Engineering & Technology Group Company Limited, Applicant and Heihe Longjiang Chemical Company Limited, 1st Respondent and China Zenith Chemical Group Limited, 2nd Respondent
  and
  IN THE MATTER of an application under Sections 84 and 92 of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap 609) of the Laws of Hong Kong for leave to enforce an arbitral award
____________
BETWEEN    
  BAOSTEEL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY GROUP COMPANY LIMITED Plaintiff/
Applicant
     

and

  CHINA ZENITH CHEMICAL GROUP LIMITED Defendant/
Respondent
     

______________

Before: Hon Mimmie Chan J in Chambers (open to public)

Date of Hearing: 11 July 2018

Date of Decision: 11 July 2018

Date of Reasons for Decision: 18 July 2018

______________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

_____________________

In Paragraph 12 on page 6 of the Reasons for Decision, “CZ’s interests” in the 2nd last sentence should read “BS’s interests”.

Dated the 23rd day of July 2018.

  (Joanne Ma)
  Clerk to Hon Mimmie Chan J